How to Spot a Conservative

Calvin Coolidge was the last Republican President to attempt to rein in government. Really, I am not sure any other president ever tried to rein in government.

Calvin Coolidge was the last Republican President to attempt to rein in government. Really, I am not sure any other president ever tried to rein in government.

 

Why do I constantly write about politics in an Economics Blog? In a free market economy, government does not pay a role in the distribution of resources. In the American economy, which is not a free market economy, political power determines how resources are used. There are no conservatives in either the house or the senate. The last presidential candidate to suggest real free market solutions was Ron Paul in 2012. He was beat up so badly by the Republican National Committee, Fox News and the media that he had no chance.

After 2008, my acid test for a real conservative was, did he support TARP? That was a very, soft test but it eliminated all but a handful of law makers and virtually all “conservative” talkĀ  show hosts. Today, I know of no conservatives running for office.

Someday a conservative may emerge. What would a conservative do that is not being done by today’s politicians? A conservative would have plans to close government agencies. You won’t hear it this year. Of course, the ideal would be candidates offering to serve strictly as delegates. That was my position in 2010 when I ran for congress. I lost very badly and voters could not understand the concept.

Voters will end up serving their representatives as they have been doing for most of our history.

Sweet Suzie’s Cool-Aid is a timely tune by Curbside Jimmy. Sweet Suzie’ Kool-Aid

Find all Curbside Jimmy Tunes at: Curbside Jimmy’s Free mp3 Download Page

00_logo_1

This entry was posted in Daily Comments and tagged , , , , , on by .

About Fantasy Free Economics

James Quillian independent scholar,free market economist,and teacher of natural law. Who is James Quillian? Certainly I am nobody special, Just a tireless academic and deep thinker. Besides that, I have broken the code with respect to economics and political science. Credentials? Nothing you would be impressed with. I am not a household name. It is hard to become famous writing that virtually no one in the country is genuinely not in touch with reality. But, if I did not do that, there would be no point in my broking the broken the code. If you read the blog, it is easy to see that there are just a few charts, no math and no quantitative analysis. That is not by accident. Given what I know, those items are completely useless. I do turn out to be highly adept at applying natural law. Natural law has predominance over any principles the social science comes up. By virtue of understanding natural law, I can debunk, in just a few sentences , any theory that calls for intervention by a government. My taking the time to understand the ins and outs of Keynes General Theory is about like expecting a chemistry student to completely grasp all that the alchemists of the middle ages thought they understood in efforts to turn base metals into goal. Keynesian theory clearly calls for complete objectivity. Government can only make political decisions. Keynesian techniques call for economic decisions. So, why go any further with that? Fantasy Free Economics is in a sense a lot like technical analysis. Technical analysis began with the premise that it was impossible to gain enough information studying fundamentals to gain a trading advantage. Study the behavior of investors instead. Unlike technical analysis, I don't use technical charts. What I understand are the incentives of different people and entities active in the economics arena. For example, there is no such thing as an incentive to serve with life in the aggregate. In the aggregate, only self interest applies. It is routinely assumed otherwise. That is highly unappealing. But, I am sorry. That is the way it is. I can accept that because I am genuinely in touch with reality. Step one in using Fantasy Free Economics is for me to understand just how little I really know. A highly credentialed economist may know 100 times what I do based on the standard dogma. Compare the knowledge each of us has compared to all there is to know and we both look like we know nothing at all. There is always more than we don't know than what we do know. I am humble enough to present myself on that basis. Why? That is the way it is. I am not bad at math. I have taught math. What I understand is when to use it and when to rely on something else. Math is useless in natural law so I don't use it. While others look at numbers, I am busy understanding the forces in nature that makes their numbers what they are. That gives me a clear advantage.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.