Is The Stock Market Rigged?

Suppose, casinos in Las Vegas or Nevada were unregulated and government never checked to see it they were cheating the public. In such a case, what are the chances gambling establishments would cheat the public? For example, would the casinos load their dice? What are the chances organized crime would take over all of the gambling establishments? I am guessing both of those things would happen, why wouldn’t they?
But, all of the casinos are highly regulated, so the public gets exactly what they are promised from a gambling establishment.

Today, the largest financial institutions in the world gamble for profit in the securities markets. Virtually all of the trading on the securities exchanges involves very short term trades. Trades lasting less than a minute and sometimes seconds and fractions of a second are the rule rather than the exception. Are they allowed to cheat as in rig the markets? Of course not, but why wouldn’t they? There is no risk in doing so.
The large financial institutions are in fact gambling establishments, but unlike licensed gambling establishments, they don’t have to prove they are not cheating. If they are ever questioned, no one in the government is smart enough to understand their trading algorithms. With this situation, government is giving the general public a very bad deal.
So, do you think the stock market is rigged? Of course it is. The eventual result will be the destruction of our capital markets. The cost to every day Americans will be their living standard.

This entry was posted in Daily Comments and tagged on by .

About Fantasy Free Economics

James Quillian independent scholar,free market economist,and teacher of natural law. Who is James Quillian? Certainly I am nobody special, Just a tireless academic and deep thinker. Besides that, I have broken the code with respect to economics and political science. Credentials? Nothing you would be impressed with. I am not a household name. It is hard to become famous writing that virtually no one in the country is genuinely not in touch with reality. But, if I did not do that, there would be no point in my broking the broken the code. If you read the blog, it is easy to see that there are just a few charts, no math and no quantitative analysis. That is not by accident. Given what I know, those items are completely useless. I do turn out to be highly adept at applying natural law. Natural law has predominance over any principles the social science comes up. By virtue of understanding natural law, I can debunk, in just a few sentences , any theory that calls for intervention by a government. My taking the time to understand the ins and outs of Keynes General Theory is about like expecting a chemistry student to completely grasp all that the alchemists of the middle ages thought they understood in efforts to turn base metals into goal. Keynesian theory clearly calls for complete objectivity. Government can only make political decisions. Keynesian techniques call for economic decisions. So, why go any further with that? Fantasy Free Economics is in a sense a lot like technical analysis. Technical analysis began with the premise that it was impossible to gain enough information studying fundamentals to gain a trading advantage. Study the behavior of investors instead. Unlike technical analysis, I don't use technical charts. What I understand are the incentives of different people and entities active in the economics arena. For example, there is no such thing as an incentive to serve with life in the aggregate. In the aggregate, only self interest applies. It is routinely assumed otherwise. That is highly unappealing. But, I am sorry. That is the way it is. I can accept that because I am genuinely in touch with reality. Step one in using Fantasy Free Economics is for me to understand just how little I really know. A highly credentialed economist may know 100 times what I do based on the standard dogma. Compare the knowledge each of us has compared to all there is to know and we both look like we know nothing at all. There is always more than we don't know than what we do know. I am humble enough to present myself on that basis. Why? That is the way it is. I am not bad at math. I have taught math. What I understand is when to use it and when to rely on something else. Math is useless in natural law so I don't use it. While others look at numbers, I am busy understanding the forces in nature that makes their numbers what they are. That gives me a clear advantage.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.