Pollyanna Democracy

In Pollyanna Democracy, people run for office as the result of a calling to serve. Citizens are independent minded and their votes are based on well thought out analysis of the issues. Political parties facilitate citizen’s participation in the political process. Pollyanna Democracy is a comforting notion and is the political system that is popularly imagined to be in place in the United States. But, Pollyanna Democracy exists nowhere but in the imaginations of American voters.
In the real world, the Democrat and Republican parties are more like competing crime families than public service institutions. Public opinion is easily managed so elections are highly limited in terms of possible outcomes. Early in life children are groomed to adhere to arbitrary loyalties and to trust unconditionally. Western society assumes that those who excel in getting elected have characteristics typical of the population they represent. Without exception, those who reach the highest elected offices and positions of leadership are sociopaths. It is possible for a non-sociopath to get elected but those kinds are never ruthless enough to hold on to their offices. Among successful politicians, obtaining and holding on to power is the driving motivation and public service is a superficial image that they are experts in projecting. Leaders in a real world democracy are both ruthless and more intelligent than the trusting docile citizens they ostensibly serve.
Our real world democracy has stopped serving as an instrument for administering justice and has deteriorated down to being a tool for redistributing wealth and income. Citizens who profess to be conservatives wrongly believe resources are being transferred from those with high incomes down to the poor. When government is used as a tool for dividing up resources, money goes to the top, without exception. The rich and powerful are far more adept than their less prosperous counterparts at using government as a means to make a profit. Redistribution of income through government always turns out badly and always ends up benefiting citizens who are higher up on the income ladder. Right wing socialism is a serious threat to what is left of our free market system and is sadly undetectable by the radars of today’s professed conservatives.
The problems faced by the U.S.A. today are not restricted to the economy. The economy is in trouble only because our system of government has become as corrupt as many of the dictatorships our people despise. In a democracy, trust and arbitrary loyalties are lethal and Americans have both in abundance. In my personal life I am finding a way for my family to survive and prosper during a time of political, and economic chaos. For all of us, it will be necessary to avoid or respond to sporadic outbreaks of violence.
The crisis we face today is real. Our population is ignorant, childishly trusting and much too docile to rise to this occasion. To save our country, two things must happen. 1.) Conservatives must take control of the country. This is difficult because all but a few Republicans are apologists for corporate welfare. They are conservatives in their own minds only. There are no conservatives in the Democratic Party. I was the last one, and I have vacated that organization. 2.) People in general will have to give up trusting.

This entry was posted in Daily Comments on by .

About Fantasy Free Economics

James Quillian independent scholar,free market economist,and teacher of natural law. Who is James Quillian? Certainly I am nobody special, Just a tireless academic and deep thinker. Besides that, I have broken the code with respect to economics and political science. Credentials? Nothing you would be impressed with. I am not a household name. It is hard to become famous writing that virtually no one in the country is genuinely not in touch with reality. But, if I did not do that, there would be no point in my broking the broken the code. If you read the blog, it is easy to see that there are just a few charts, no math and no quantitative analysis. That is not by accident. Given what I know, those items are completely useless. I do turn out to be highly adept at applying natural law. Natural law has predominance over any principles the social science comes up. By virtue of understanding natural law, I can debunk, in just a few sentences , any theory that calls for intervention by a government. My taking the time to understand the ins and outs of Keynes General Theory is about like expecting a chemistry student to completely grasp all that the alchemists of the middle ages thought they understood in efforts to turn base metals into goal. Keynesian theory clearly calls for complete objectivity. Government can only make political decisions. Keynesian techniques call for economic decisions. So, why go any further with that? Fantasy Free Economics is in a sense a lot like technical analysis. Technical analysis began with the premise that it was impossible to gain enough information studying fundamentals to gain a trading advantage. Study the behavior of investors instead. Unlike technical analysis, I don't use technical charts. What I understand are the incentives of different people and entities active in the economics arena. For example, there is no such thing as an incentive to serve with life in the aggregate. In the aggregate, only self interest applies. It is routinely assumed otherwise. That is highly unappealing. But, I am sorry. That is the way it is. I can accept that because I am genuinely in touch with reality. Step one in using Fantasy Free Economics is for me to understand just how little I really know. A highly credentialed economist may know 100 times what I do based on the standard dogma. Compare the knowledge each of us has compared to all there is to know and we both look like we know nothing at all. There is always more than we don't know than what we do know. I am humble enough to present myself on that basis. Why? That is the way it is. I am not bad at math. I have taught math. What I understand is when to use it and when to rely on something else. Math is useless in natural law so I don't use it. While others look at numbers, I am busy understanding the forces in nature that makes their numbers what they are. That gives me a clear advantage.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.