Little Hitlers

55c41fc9169027501c6ef3bb_gop-debate-2015Every sociopath is a potential Hitler. All presidential candidates are sociopaths. There is no way to advance this far in politics without being a sociopath.  This is the most competitive event in the world. As nice as each candidate appears, every one of them is completely ruthless and will stop at nothing to get what they want.

Many forget that Adolph Hitler used the democratic process to become dictator. Mark my words both the economy and the stock market are going to get a lot worse.  Tyrants and despots rise to power when times are bad and voters are troubled.  Mark my words. The stock market is going to get much worse and the overall economy is going to completely sink. Sociopaths smell the blood. That is why there are an unprecedented 16 candidates seeking the presidency.

No, candidates don’t run for office because they love you, although it must be totally comfortable to look at it that way. All run out of self interest. That would not be all that bad if citizens didn’t insist that it is the other way around.

Ostriches are fine with sticking their heads in the sand. Euphemisms are the sand that voters voters stick their heads in.

Treat candidates as messiahs or saviors and you set yourself up to be exploited. You will be and always have been. Treat candidates as delegates and government is completely controllable.  The delegate model of representation has never been tried. It would be nice to give it a chance.

Worship your leaders and you are serving them. Treat them as delegates and they are serving you.

Here are a couple of very timely tunes tunes written and recorded by Curbside Jimmy.

Hard Times Coming
When Times Got Really Weird

00_logo_1

This entry was posted in Daily Comments on by .

About Fantasy Free Economics

James Quillian independent scholar,free market economist,and teacher of natural law. Who is James Quillian? Certainly I am nobody special, Just a tireless academic and deep thinker. Besides that, I have broken the code with respect to economics and political science. Credentials? Nothing you would be impressed with. I am not a household name. It is hard to become famous writing that virtually no one in the country is genuinely not in touch with reality. But, if I did not do that, there would be no point in my broking the broken the code. If you read the blog, it is easy to see that there are just a few charts, no math and no quantitative analysis. That is not by accident. Given what I know, those items are completely useless. I do turn out to be highly adept at applying natural law. Natural law has predominance over any principles the social science comes up. By virtue of understanding natural law, I can debunk, in just a few sentences , any theory that calls for intervention by a government. My taking the time to understand the ins and outs of Keynes General Theory is about like expecting a chemistry student to completely grasp all that the alchemists of the middle ages thought they understood in efforts to turn base metals into goal. Keynesian theory clearly calls for complete objectivity. Government can only make political decisions. Keynesian techniques call for economic decisions. So, why go any further with that? Fantasy Free Economics is in a sense a lot like technical analysis. Technical analysis began with the premise that it was impossible to gain enough information studying fundamentals to gain a trading advantage. Study the behavior of investors instead. Unlike technical analysis, I don't use technical charts. What I understand are the incentives of different people and entities active in the economics arena. For example, there is no such thing as an incentive to serve with life in the aggregate. In the aggregate, only self interest applies. It is routinely assumed otherwise. That is highly unappealing. But, I am sorry. That is the way it is. I can accept that because I am genuinely in touch with reality. Step one in using Fantasy Free Economics is for me to understand just how little I really know. A highly credentialed economist may know 100 times what I do based on the standard dogma. Compare the knowledge each of us has compared to all there is to know and we both look like we know nothing at all. There is always more than we don't know than what we do know. I am humble enough to present myself on that basis. Why? That is the way it is. I am not bad at math. I have taught math. What I understand is when to use it and when to rely on something else. Math is useless in natural law so I don't use it. While others look at numbers, I am busy understanding the forces in nature that makes their numbers what they are. That gives me a clear advantage.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.