Stock Market Seasonal Pattern

The period between August 1 and October 17 on average is the weakest period of the year. A complete rout of the stock market was avoided. For the next several weeks the attention of our manipulators will be devoted to showing that the correction is over.

There is enormous supply hanging over the market. The attitude of the Fed is changing. It is probably out of fear of being exposed. The appearance is that friends of the Fed are having trouble turning risk free profits. For decades trading has been dominated by extreme short term trading. I am talking about trades that last for seconds and even fractions of a second. In terms of long term holdings, volume has been sparse for decades. The length of the average trade can change to a longer time period. Up to now, very little in the way of long term holdings have hit the market to be sold. Can the friends of the Fed profit if the average trade lasts 5 minutes instead of just a few seconds? I doubt they can. That circumstances may cause a crash. Any serious decline will usher in the manipulators last tool. That will be to use government to pass as much in losses to the public as is possible.

As we move further into the fall, there will be good news in the way of sudden enlightenment announcements. We are in earnings season. Whether or not earnings hit or miss, the numbers will be embellished as much as possible. Over a ten year period, earnings must average out in a way they are honest. In a period of crime infested government, earnings can be just about anything the corporations want them to be for any given quarter. Any miss is much worse than reported. Any beat is not as good as it appears. Earnings beats are reported just like a commercial. Timing is never ignored and all else for effect.

One of two scenarios will play out. The economy actually has been destroyed. It is only a matter of time before GDP growth starts sinking into the red. Earnings will become so poor that embellishing them will no  longer be possible. Once the economy folds completely the stock market will be unsavable. Or, enough long term holdings will hit the market that all of the organized support in the world will not be enough to prevent a bear market.

From mid October through year end, I am looking for the market to be in no man’s land. I don’t own a single share of stock.  I am still 95% in cash myself.  I do have very small positions in a number of bear ETFs. Last weak I added to my FAZ and TZA positions. These are not short term positions. I won’t close them until after the market falls. What if the market doesn’t fall? I will lose. There are no stops. I am taking a clear unhedged risk. I don’t know of a way to work the downside here other than what I am doing. I have only 3x bear ETFs. A few of these kinds of positions can grow by leaps and bounds in a bear market.  My rule is never try and make more than a 12% annual return. I learned years ago that my odds of making a 25% annual gain are better when I am actually only trying to make a smaller number.

I don’t make short term trades but do take high risk positions and try to stay fully committed for an entire market move. I will start closing positions when I think the bear market has run its course.

Any short position is going to get squeezed.

As always, the stock market is a combination of stress and uncertainty.

The truth is a hard sell. Fantasy Free Economics gains readers one at a time. Major search engines simply do not list blogs which disagree with their political agenda. As long as folks share the link to this blog and others speaking out against the grain, the truth will at least trickle into the public consciousness.

Fantasy Free Economics recommends the following blogs.

Of Two Minds Liberty Blitzkrieg Mises Institute Straight Line Logic Paul Craig Roberts

This entry was posted in Daily Comments on by .

About Fantasy Free Economics

James Quillian independent scholar,free market economist,and teacher of natural law. Who is James Quillian? Certainly I am nobody special, Just a tireless academic and deep thinker. Besides that, I have broken the code with respect to economics and political science. Credentials? Nothing you would be impressed with. I am not a household name. It is hard to become famous writing that virtually no one in the country is genuinely not in touch with reality. But, if I did not do that, there would be no point in my broking the broken the code. If you read the blog, it is easy to see that there are just a few charts, no math and no quantitative analysis. That is not by accident. Given what I know, those items are completely useless. I do turn out to be highly adept at applying natural law. Natural law has predominance over any principles the social science comes up. By virtue of understanding natural law, I can debunk, in just a few sentences , any theory that calls for intervention by a government. My taking the time to understand the ins and outs of Keynes General Theory is about like expecting a chemistry student to completely grasp all that the alchemists of the middle ages thought they understood in efforts to turn base metals into goal. Keynesian theory clearly calls for complete objectivity. Government can only make political decisions. Keynesian techniques call for economic decisions. So, why go any further with that? Fantasy Free Economics is in a sense a lot like technical analysis. Technical analysis began with the premise that it was impossible to gain enough information studying fundamentals to gain a trading advantage. Study the behavior of investors instead. Unlike technical analysis, I don't use technical charts. What I understand are the incentives of different people and entities active in the economics arena. For example, there is no such thing as an incentive to serve with life in the aggregate. In the aggregate, only self interest applies. It is routinely assumed otherwise. That is highly unappealing. But, I am sorry. That is the way it is. I can accept that because I am genuinely in touch with reality. Step one in using Fantasy Free Economics is for me to understand just how little I really know. A highly credentialed economist may know 100 times what I do based on the standard dogma. Compare the knowledge each of us has compared to all there is to know and we both look like we know nothing at all. There is always more than we don't know than what we do know. I am humble enough to present myself on that basis. Why? That is the way it is. I am not bad at math. I have taught math. What I understand is when to use it and when to rely on something else. Math is useless in natural law so I don't use it. While others look at numbers, I am busy understanding the forces in nature that makes their numbers what they are. That gives me a clear advantage.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.