Winning With Belligerence

We have heard it said that cheaters never win. But, is belligerence cheating? It can be in games with rules. In the game of dominance and subservience there are no pre-established rules. There are rules and limits to what a person can do that have evolved over the years.

Many eons ago when government and religion were one in the same an ancient document called the 10 commandments became part of major religions. This was as much of a voluntary set of rules people had to live by voluntarily in order for civilization to flourish as it was a directive from God. This is not to say it was not a directive from God. Regardless of whether it was or not, mankind needed to voluntarily abstain from certain behaviors in order for the species to be civilized.

One of the things forbidden was making personal gains by belligerence. Besides providing for optimum output in an economy, the free market concept is the father of peace. In the stone age belligerence was by far the fastest and best way for one group of people the get the most out of a different group of people.

Even in the modern era, the land we all stand on was originally obtained through belligerence. We do have free exchange in the real estate market, but the land we split up and trade was gained by belligerence in the process of becoming part of the United States. National boundaries have historically been determined and defined by the use of force. All national territories have been gained by belligerence.

Free markets are the economies of peace. Various forms of socialism are based on economics of force or belligerence. When socialism is offered as a better system, whether it be top down socialism or classic socialism, well being is achieved by using government to impose one person’s will onto another.

When you hear of a plan to stimulate the economy or to redistribute income by government edict belligerence is being recommended as a better system than peace in determining economic outcomes. There are no exceptions.

The truth is a hard sell. Fantasy Free Economics gains readers one at a time. Major search engines simply do not list blogs which disagree with their political agenda. As long as folks share the link to this blog and others speaking out against the grain, the truth will at least trickle into the public consciousness.

Fantasy Free Economics recommends the following blogs.

Of Two Minds Liberty Blitzkrieg Mises Institute Straight Line Logic Paul Craig Roberts

This entry was posted in Daily Comments on by .

About Fantasy Free Economics

James Quillian independent scholar,free market economist,and teacher of natural law. Who is James Quillian? Certainly I am nobody special, Just a tireless academic and deep thinker. Besides that, I have broken the code with respect to economics and political science. Credentials? Nothing you would be impressed with. I am not a household name. It is hard to become famous writing that virtually no one in the country is genuinely not in touch with reality. But, if I did not do that, there would be no point in my broking the broken the code. If you read the blog, it is easy to see that there are just a few charts, no math and no quantitative analysis. That is not by accident. Given what I know, those items are completely useless. I do turn out to be highly adept at applying natural law. Natural law has predominance over any principles the social science comes up. By virtue of understanding natural law, I can debunk, in just a few sentences , any theory that calls for intervention by a government. My taking the time to understand the ins and outs of Keynes General Theory is about like expecting a chemistry student to completely grasp all that the alchemists of the middle ages thought they understood in efforts to turn base metals into goal. Keynesian theory clearly calls for complete objectivity. Government can only make political decisions. Keynesian techniques call for economic decisions. So, why go any further with that? Fantasy Free Economics is in a sense a lot like technical analysis. Technical analysis began with the premise that it was impossible to gain enough information studying fundamentals to gain a trading advantage. Study the behavior of investors instead. Unlike technical analysis, I don't use technical charts. What I understand are the incentives of different people and entities active in the economics arena. For example, there is no such thing as an incentive to serve with life in the aggregate. In the aggregate, only self interest applies. It is routinely assumed otherwise. That is highly unappealing. But, I am sorry. That is the way it is. I can accept that because I am genuinely in touch with reality. Step one in using Fantasy Free Economics is for me to understand just how little I really know. A highly credentialed economist may know 100 times what I do based on the standard dogma. Compare the knowledge each of us has compared to all there is to know and we both look like we know nothing at all. There is always more than we don't know than what we do know. I am humble enough to present myself on that basis. Why? That is the way it is. I am not bad at math. I have taught math. What I understand is when to use it and when to rely on something else. Math is useless in natural law so I don't use it. While others look at numbers, I am busy understanding the forces in nature that makes their numbers what they are. That gives me a clear advantage.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.