The Language no One Speaks

Other animals seem to communicate with a system of transmitting and receiving mental images. When my wife is out shopping, the dog will go sit by the window and wait, and in about ten minutes she will pull into the driveway. Apparently the dog picks up a mental impression when my wife decides to come home. Many dog owners have noticed their pets seem to have psychic abilities.
It makes sense that animals communicate psychically and there is good reason why people do not. Suppose people picked up mental images from one another. If person A had negative feelings about person B, person B would have an incentive to launch a preemptive attack on person A. It would be a detriment to survival for others to know our thoughts about them.
Most likely, early on in the evolutionary process, as intelligence increased, verbal language evolved and the wordless communication was diminished. Surely some of it has survived but few recognize the thoughts and impressions that it produces. The impressions come in as non specific.
Who has not had the experience of a wave of fear or despondency coming upon them out of nowhere? Where such things come form is treated as a mystery. Perhaps mental pictures do come from other people. It may be more than a coincidence that thoughts and ideas become very synchronized and standardized within given populations.
Perhaps we all broadcast a basic image of who we are and what we are about and that is why some are charismatic and others are perceived as dull and boring. It may be possible then to change the image one projects.

This entry was posted in Daily Comments on by .

About Fantasy Free Economics

James Quillian independent scholar,free market economist,and teacher of natural law. Who is James Quillian? Certainly I am nobody special, Just a tireless academic and deep thinker. Besides that, I have broken the code with respect to economics and political science. Credentials? Nothing you would be impressed with. I am not a household name. It is hard to become famous writing that virtually no one in the country is genuinely not in touch with reality. But, if I did not do that, there would be no point in my broking the broken the code. If you read the blog, it is easy to see that there are just a few charts, no math and no quantitative analysis. That is not by accident. Given what I know, those items are completely useless. I do turn out to be highly adept at applying natural law. Natural law has predominance over any principles the social science comes up. By virtue of understanding natural law, I can debunk, in just a few sentences , any theory that calls for intervention by a government. My taking the time to understand the ins and outs of Keynes General Theory is about like expecting a chemistry student to completely grasp all that the alchemists of the middle ages thought they understood in efforts to turn base metals into goal. Keynesian theory clearly calls for complete objectivity. Government can only make political decisions. Keynesian techniques call for economic decisions. So, why go any further with that? Fantasy Free Economics is in a sense a lot like technical analysis. Technical analysis began with the premise that it was impossible to gain enough information studying fundamentals to gain a trading advantage. Study the behavior of investors instead. Unlike technical analysis, I don't use technical charts. What I understand are the incentives of different people and entities active in the economics arena. For example, there is no such thing as an incentive to serve with life in the aggregate. In the aggregate, only self interest applies. It is routinely assumed otherwise. That is highly unappealing. But, I am sorry. That is the way it is. I can accept that because I am genuinely in touch with reality. Step one in using Fantasy Free Economics is for me to understand just how little I really know. A highly credentialed economist may know 100 times what I do based on the standard dogma. Compare the knowledge each of us has compared to all there is to know and we both look like we know nothing at all. There is always more than we don't know than what we do know. I am humble enough to present myself on that basis. Why? That is the way it is. I am not bad at math. I have taught math. What I understand is when to use it and when to rely on something else. Math is useless in natural law so I don't use it. While others look at numbers, I am busy understanding the forces in nature that makes their numbers what they are. That gives me a clear advantage.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.