World’s Greatest Economist

Who is the world’s greatest economist? For just a little while, that would be me, James Quillian of Common Sense Economics. This situation will change as soon as just one smart person grasps some basic ideas and expands on them. It turns out that economics has failed to identify mankind’s most relevant and common transaction. A smart person will grab this principle and expand on it. Then there will be a new world’s greatest economist.
A bargaining process begins at birth. Baby starts trading freedom for comfort and continues doing the same thing until death. Economics assumes the autonomy of each individual. Certainly autonomy is possible for every person but the default mode is to bargain it away. Economic and political policies all assume individuals are freedom lovers. In our nation building endeavors the expectation is always that the natives will take liberty and run with it. There is great surprise when it doesn’t happen that way. People only do what comes natural. They bargain off their freedom time and time again because there are advantages in doing it that way. A better chance of surviving is one of them. A way to deal with the extreme stress of living is another.
So, what does it matter? It guarantees the failure of every macroeconomic model. It alters the nature of entire political systems. People are assumed to behave one way in the economy but their behavior is something else. The results of nation building efforts are confounding. The expectation is that when given liberty people will take freedom and run with it. They immediately begin trading freedom for comfort. Words like democracy and liberty are used to describe systems of self government but citizens expect leaders to act as messiahs. Being free translates into choosing one’s own master.
Self government breaks down because; leaders take office not to serve constituents but to further their own interests. What citizens expect and what they get are two different things. This is all human nature which takes thousands of years to change or improve upon.

This entry was posted in Daily Comments on by .

About Fantasy Free Economics

James Quillian independent scholar,free market economist,and teacher of natural law. Who is James Quillian? Certainly I am nobody special, Just a tireless academic and deep thinker. Besides that, I have broken the code with respect to economics and political science. Credentials? Nothing you would be impressed with. I am not a household name. It is hard to become famous writing that virtually no one in the country is genuinely not in touch with reality. But, if I did not do that, there would be no point in my broking the broken the code. If you read the blog, it is easy to see that there are just a few charts, no math and no quantitative analysis. That is not by accident. Given what I know, those items are completely useless. I do turn out to be highly adept at applying natural law. Natural law has predominance over any principles the social science comes up. By virtue of understanding natural law, I can debunk, in just a few sentences , any theory that calls for intervention by a government. My taking the time to understand the ins and outs of Keynes General Theory is about like expecting a chemistry student to completely grasp all that the alchemists of the middle ages thought they understood in efforts to turn base metals into goal. Keynesian theory clearly calls for complete objectivity. Government can only make political decisions. Keynesian techniques call for economic decisions. So, why go any further with that? Fantasy Free Economics is in a sense a lot like technical analysis. Technical analysis began with the premise that it was impossible to gain enough information studying fundamentals to gain a trading advantage. Study the behavior of investors instead. Unlike technical analysis, I don't use technical charts. What I understand are the incentives of different people and entities active in the economics arena. For example, there is no such thing as an incentive to serve with life in the aggregate. In the aggregate, only self interest applies. It is routinely assumed otherwise. That is highly unappealing. But, I am sorry. That is the way it is. I can accept that because I am genuinely in touch with reality. Step one in using Fantasy Free Economics is for me to understand just how little I really know. A highly credentialed economist may know 100 times what I do based on the standard dogma. Compare the knowledge each of us has compared to all there is to know and we both look like we know nothing at all. There is always more than we don't know than what we do know. I am humble enough to present myself on that basis. Why? That is the way it is. I am not bad at math. I have taught math. What I understand is when to use it and when to rely on something else. Math is useless in natural law so I don't use it. While others look at numbers, I am busy understanding the forces in nature that makes their numbers what they are. That gives me a clear advantage.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.