Truth on Memorial Day

memorial-day1 The truth has no utility in politics because something that sounds better is always more appealing. Competing for elected positions requires appealing candidates. Candidates who tell the truth always lose.

It is an unpleasant fact, but although is is constantly stated that men and women in uniform have died so the we can be free, military initiatives never have worked that way. The typical war in which the U.S. engages actually creates more danger for American citizens and does nothing to keep anyone free.

World War II is usually mentioned as a necessary war that was unavoidable. There is a very real reason why fighting WW II was necessary. Without the United States having engaged in imperialist undertakings in preceding years, WW II would have been optional. The Spanish American war was fought because Spain was fraudulently held responsible for the sinking of the Battle Ship Main. Of course the Spanish did not sink any American ships. The charges were trumped up and untrue.

The U.S. had no natural right to own any of the Islands in the Pacific where the Japanese attacked Americans. The Philippines were acquired as part of Spain’s surrender agreement. In Hawaii, the U.S. just ousted the emperor and took possession. The U.S. had no option but to declare war, only because we were occupying lands that we had previously stolen.

I have stated countless times that the outcomes of national inititives are not determined by the end in mind. The means is what determines the outcome. This is one of those natural laws which almost no one acknowledges or believes. Any action that is immoral will generate a negative outcome. History provides no cases where this principle has not held true and been validated. The true way our government can keep us free is to be careful to do only moral things.

The outcomes of U.S. imperialist conquests resulted in all of the deaths of Americans during WWII. The imperialist actions were immoral and we lost in the end far more than we gained.

It is good for the self esteem to celebrate the goodness of the American troops who have died in Uniform. It makes it easier to get young people to join the military. Regardless, it is wrong to tell young people they are fighting for freedom when they are really fighting for the business interests of sociopaths who don’t give a damn if soldiers live or die.

This entry was posted in Daily Comments and tagged , , , , , on by .

About Fantasy Free Economics

James Quillian independent scholar,free market economist,and teacher of natural law. Who is James Quillian? Certainly I am nobody special, Just a tireless academic and deep thinker. Besides that, I have broken the code with respect to economics and political science. Credentials? Nothing you would be impressed with. I am not a household name. It is hard to become famous writing that virtually no one in the country is genuinely not in touch with reality. But, if I did not do that, there would be no point in my broking the broken the code. If you read the blog, it is easy to see that there are just a few charts, no math and no quantitative analysis. That is not by accident. Given what I know, those items are completely useless. I do turn out to be highly adept at applying natural law. Natural law has predominance over any principles the social science comes up. By virtue of understanding natural law, I can debunk, in just a few sentences , any theory that calls for intervention by a government. My taking the time to understand the ins and outs of Keynes General Theory is about like expecting a chemistry student to completely grasp all that the alchemists of the middle ages thought they understood in efforts to turn base metals into goal. Keynesian theory clearly calls for complete objectivity. Government can only make political decisions. Keynesian techniques call for economic decisions. So, why go any further with that? Fantasy Free Economics is in a sense a lot like technical analysis. Technical analysis began with the premise that it was impossible to gain enough information studying fundamentals to gain a trading advantage. Study the behavior of investors instead. Unlike technical analysis, I don't use technical charts. What I understand are the incentives of different people and entities active in the economics arena. For example, there is no such thing as an incentive to serve with life in the aggregate. In the aggregate, only self interest applies. It is routinely assumed otherwise. That is highly unappealing. But, I am sorry. That is the way it is. I can accept that because I am genuinely in touch with reality. Step one in using Fantasy Free Economics is for me to understand just how little I really know. A highly credentialed economist may know 100 times what I do based on the standard dogma. Compare the knowledge each of us has compared to all there is to know and we both look like we know nothing at all. There is always more than we don't know than what we do know. I am humble enough to present myself on that basis. Why? That is the way it is. I am not bad at math. I have taught math. What I understand is when to use it and when to rely on something else. Math is useless in natural law so I don't use it. While others look at numbers, I am busy understanding the forces in nature that makes their numbers what they are. That gives me a clear advantage.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.