Amazon.com and Today’s Earnings

Amazon.com has been trading for $300+ for a while with a price earnings ratio of around 600. In a real world setting AMZN would be trading for under $5.00. Common Sense Economics knows that for the human species, work is a second choice. Bragging about work ethics and personal initiative is a staple in human to human conversation. Make no mistake, rent seeking for the elite is the preferred method of making a living. For company insiders, goosing a stock price by hook or crook is the best and most lucrative way get paid.
Countless elites rejoice as a stock like AMZN moves into the stratosphere. Chests are pounded and the virtues of hard work and capitalism are proudly proclaimed. But, stock prices are managed politically and the elite are really just on welfare, although not officially.
Government economic policy extracts countless dollars from the poor and middle class every second and transferees it to the billionaire class. Folks don’t seem to mind, especially those who identify as conservatives. QE keeps profit margins up and wages down and rank and file conservatives relish in the role of paying tribute to their role models.
In the end, government policy destroys the whole economy, elites and everyone else. But, the elites don’t care. They have already eaten their lunch.
Perhaps, the real economy is too weak for AMZN to avoid losses anymore and hype is working less well as a promotional tool. Consumers are getting less impressed with playing the role of sucker.
It turns out that despite the finest hype money can buy, AMZN has reported a loss. Buybacks won’t help a company that can’t report positive earnings because fewer shares magnify losses just as they magnify profits.

This entry was posted in Daily Comments on by .

About Fantasy Free Economics

James Quillian independent scholar,free market economist,and teacher of natural law. Who is James Quillian? Certainly I am nobody special, Just a tireless academic and deep thinker. Besides that, I have broken the code with respect to economics and political science. Credentials? Nothing you would be impressed with. I am not a household name. It is hard to become famous writing that virtually no one in the country is genuinely not in touch with reality. But, if I did not do that, there would be no point in my broking the broken the code. If you read the blog, it is easy to see that there are just a few charts, no math and no quantitative analysis. That is not by accident. Given what I know, those items are completely useless. I do turn out to be highly adept at applying natural law. Natural law has predominance over any principles the social science comes up. By virtue of understanding natural law, I can debunk, in just a few sentences , any theory that calls for intervention by a government. My taking the time to understand the ins and outs of Keynes General Theory is about like expecting a chemistry student to completely grasp all that the alchemists of the middle ages thought they understood in efforts to turn base metals into goal. Keynesian theory clearly calls for complete objectivity. Government can only make political decisions. Keynesian techniques call for economic decisions. So, why go any further with that? Fantasy Free Economics is in a sense a lot like technical analysis. Technical analysis began with the premise that it was impossible to gain enough information studying fundamentals to gain a trading advantage. Study the behavior of investors instead. Unlike technical analysis, I don't use technical charts. What I understand are the incentives of different people and entities active in the economics arena. For example, there is no such thing as an incentive to serve with life in the aggregate. In the aggregate, only self interest applies. It is routinely assumed otherwise. That is highly unappealing. But, I am sorry. That is the way it is. I can accept that because I am genuinely in touch with reality. Step one in using Fantasy Free Economics is for me to understand just how little I really know. A highly credentialed economist may know 100 times what I do based on the standard dogma. Compare the knowledge each of us has compared to all there is to know and we both look like we know nothing at all. There is always more than we don't know than what we do know. I am humble enough to present myself on that basis. Why? That is the way it is. I am not bad at math. I have taught math. What I understand is when to use it and when to rely on something else. Math is useless in natural law so I don't use it. While others look at numbers, I am busy understanding the forces in nature that makes their numbers what they are. That gives me a clear advantage.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.