Tag Archives: Ted Cruz

Beto O’rourke Vs. Ted Cruz

Beto O’rourke is the type of candidate who wins elections. It is my opinion that he will beat Ted Cruz in the Texas senate seat election this November.

Never forget that the race is between two sociopaths. How do I know these two candidates are sociopaths? Only a sociopath has the skills required to compete in such a competitive contest. Texas is cited as a conservative state. Texas is a red state. There is nothing conservative about either siting senators from Texas. Beto O’rourke is a much more appealing candidate than Ted Cruz. I think he will win. I don’t support either candidate. O’rourke is a master at both telling voters what they want to hear and making folks who disagree feel good about voting for him anyway.

What are the issues in the race? The only issues you will hear anything about are the ones being talked about today in the conservative and liberal echo chambers. Are there any other issues? The biggest issues are the trade war and the new income transferring ballooning deficit spending stimulus initiative. There is the war for profit issue. There are other issues we know nothing of. Congress hordes information and keeps it from the public constantly. Formal elections are for the comfort of the citizens. Most of what happens in government is the result of who has or doesn’t have political power in the informal system. Expect all of the political dialog to focus on superficial issues with superficial information.

O’rourke has taken ownership of the legalize cannabis issue. That will help him a great deal. Chances are good that Trump will find a way to reschedule marijuana and or make other legalization overtures before election day. O’rourke is first with the issue, and that will help him.

Do not mistake Texas voters as conservatives. The average Republican in Texas, depends far more on government than Democratic counterparts. There is not one conservative initiative in the state right now. Elections today are about which candidate is perceived as delivering the most essence from government. Republicans generally benefit hugely but indirectly from government policy. Democrats are perceived as getting direct benefits like welfare or food stamps. In no case at all is price the preferred method of deciding who gets what in terms of goods and services. Texans like all others today expect to get their essence first from government.

The Cruz/O’rourke race is not about being a conservative or a liberal. The difference is in the style of extracting benefits out of the overall population.

The truth is a hard sell. Fantasy Free Economics gains readers one at a time. Major search engines simply do not list blogs which disagree with their political agenda. As long as folks share the link to this blog and others speaking out against the grain, the truth will at least trickle into the public consciousness.

Fantasy Free Economics recommends the following blogs.

Of Two Minds Liberty Blitzkrieg Mises Institute Straight Line Logic Paul Craig Roberts

Ted Cruz and the Flat Tax

The flat tax is a gift to the donor class. Never support a candidate who proposes changes in the tax code without reductions in spending first. If you have no political power any change made through government will be a disadvantage to you.

There is one good reason for taxing the rich out of proportion to the rest of society. The rich lobby constantly to increase the size and role of government.  The rich reap enormous benefits from the growth of government and thus should pay the majority of its costs.

The most valuable attribute of any tax is in keeping citizens aware of the cost of government.  When spending is increased, citizens need to experience a loss of disposable income. Changes to the tax code in tax code by proposed politicians always facilitate more spending and guarantee citizens won’t object. If they don’t feel it, they won’t care.

 

Stir the Pot

stirring-pot-3063194I don’t support candidates. Candidates run for office out of self interest. There is nothing wrong with that but expecting them to immediately take the causes of those who elect them is completely unrealistic. Government provides a way for all participants to get what they want. Politicians don’t represent voters even while voters stubbornly expect them to.

This cycle I am pulling for the few who are stirring the pot. Those candidates are Donald Trump, Ted Cruz and Rand Paul. None of these folks are good people but stirring the pot has high utility to the country right now. Pulling for is not the same as supporting.

Why stir the pot? As it is, cooperation between elected representatives, corporate elitists and the news media is solid. This arrangement is in the process of destroying the country. From now on do no expect much media coverage of Donald Trump, Ted Cruz, or Rand Paul now that two of the three have become aggressive.

Look for each of these guys to get dismissed from this point on. Normally the RNC sends out attack dogs to get rid of candidates who challenge the status quo. I am not sure there is an attack dog brave enough to go after Donald Trump. Trump is highly adept at verbal conflict. Trump also has the “trump” card of of threatening to go third party. If he does that, no Republican has a prayer.

Fascism kills and the sooner it fails the better is the chance that the country will survive. To kill off fascism early it is necessary to break up the unholy trinity of corporate elitists, government and media. Left to their own devices these kinds will mercilessly pursue their own interests until there is a revolution. Don’t forget that in the absence of constant deterrents, government and crime merge over time. Today crime controls government.

Understanding Donald Trump

x299353078_donald-trump-pres-blogIt seems Donald Trump is drawing maximum heat from both Republicans and Democrats. Trump is also drawing maximum attention. Attention is what all of the others need but have no way to get. Trump may also be the first non apologizer. Demands for an apology are coming like machine gun fire. What will happen if Trump never apologizes? The problem his detractors have is that if Trump does apologize, he is apologizing for telling the truth. The truth is not used in politics so people are confused and disoriented when it makes an appearance.

Don’t misunderstand. Trump is not honest. He has just found a unique set of circumstances where the truth might actually have utility. He has nothing to lose by being straight forward. I see Trump’s discourse as distinguishing him from all of the other candidates. That is a long shot approach but he would have no chance at all as just one member of the mob of sixteen. The other candidates all bury one another with mush.

Do not expect truthfulness out of Donald Trump for the duration of the campaign. It is hard to win an argument with Trump when he is wrong. Telling the truth in the early days of the campaign gives him a distinct advantage. He will be perceived as a straight shooter all the way to the end. All he has to do is not apologize and his early truthful discourse will fade away. The straight shooter image will stick.

Trump may be the best in the world at diminishing others who attack him. I am not sure who will take the risk more than once. Give Trump a black eye. Just expect two black eyes in return.

Would a contest between Hilary Clinton and Donald trump be interesting? The world’s best liar would be squared off against the world’s greatest put down artist.